Research Database
This tool allows education practitioners and researchers to quickly access quantitative research on tutoring program effectiveness. These 150+ research studies were selected due to their rigorous research designs which align with What Works Clearinghouse and Every Student Succeeds Act standards for moderate and strong evidence of intervention efficacy. Many studies were originally identified by their inclusion in recent meta-analyses (Baye et al., 2018; Neitzel et al., 2021; Nickow et al., 2020). Research may be sorted by grade level, subject, and tutor type in order to explore the evidence base for particular program designs. This database does not include qualitative research on best practices for tutoring implementation, for which we recommend exploring our District Playbook and Toolkit for Tutoring Programs.
If you have additional research studies (quantitative or qualitative) that you would like to share, please fill out this form or send an email to info@studentsupportaccelerator.org.
Displaying 31 - 49 of 49Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for lowskilled kindergarteners in the context of language minority status and classroom phonics instruction. (2010). Vadasy, P. F. & Sanders, E. A.. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-21221-001
Implementation of effective intervention: An empirical study to evaluate the efficacy of fountas & pinnell’s leveled literacy intervention system . (2010). Ransford-Kaldon, C. R., Flynt, E. S., Ross, C. L., Franceschini, L., Zoblotsky, T., Huang, Y., & Gallagher, B.. Center for Research in Educational Policy (CREP). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544374
Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled kindergarteners in the context of language minority status and classroom phonics instruction. (2010). Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. . Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 786–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019639
Using the right design to get the ‘wrong’ answer? Results of a random assignment evaluation of a volunteer tutoring programme. (2008). Ritter, G., & Maynard, R.. Journal of Children’s Services, 3(2), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200800008
Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A replication and comparison of instructional groupings. (2008). Vadasy, P. F. & Sanders, E. A.. Reading and Writing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ815903
The Effects of the Fast Start Program on the Reading Achievement of Emergent and Beginning Readers: A Replication and Extension. (2007). Mears, P. R.. 132. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=e…
Closing the reading gap: Findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. (2007). Torgesen, J. K., Schirm, A., Castner, L., Vartivarian, S., Mansfield, W., Myers, D., … Haan, C. . Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084013.pdf
Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial withfuchsparaeducator implementers. (2006). Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Peyton, J. A.. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ742197
Code-Oriented Instruction for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties: A Randomized Field Trial with Paraeducator Implementers. (2006). Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Peyton, J. A.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 508–528. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ742197
Tutor-assisted intensive learning strategies in kindergarten: How much is enough?. (2005). Al Otaiba, S., Schatschneider, C., & Silverman, E.. Exceptionality. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-13831-002
Effects of two tutoring programs on the English reading development of Spanish-English bilingual students. (2004). Denton, C. A., Anthony, J. L., Parker, R., & Hasbrouck, J. E.. The Elementary School Journal, 104(4), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1086/499754
Short-term impact of experience Corps® participation on children and schools: Results from a pilot randomized trial. (2004). Rebok, G. W., Carlson, M. C., Glass, T. A., McGill, S., Hill, J., Wasik, B. A., Ialongo, N., Frick, K. D., Fried, L. P., & Rasmussen, M. D.. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 81(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jth095
Adult-mediated reading instruction for third through fifth grade children with reading difficulties. (2002). Lachney, R. P.. LSU Doctoral Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3483
Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. (2002). O'Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, K. R., Larkin, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N.. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-18006-003
When less may be more: A 2‐year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. (2000). Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T.. Reading Research Quarterly. https://www.jstor.org/stable/748095?seq=1
The Efficacy of Supplemental Instruction in Decoding Skills for Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Students in Early Elementary School. (2000). Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D.. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690003400204
Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. (1997). Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A.. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0103_3
An evaluation of reading recovery. (1995). Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M.. Reading Research Quarterly. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/an-evaluation-of-reading-recovery